Latest stories

United States v. Hunt

U

19-1754 United States v. Hunt UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A...

Liu v. Congress

L

19-3054 Liu v. Congress UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER Rulings by summary order do not have precedential effect. Citation to a summary order filed on or after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this court, a party must...

J.W. v. T.M. and C.M. (mem. dec.)

J

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Oct 28 2020, 8:18 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals estoppel, or the law of the case. and Tax Court ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES Justin R...

Barbara Kauffman v. Teresa K. Kelly (mem. dec.)

B

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Oct 28 2020, 9:06 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals estoppel, or the law of the case. and Tax Court ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE Bryce...

GAYNOR MONIQUE STEPHENSON v. LENDINGHOME FUNDING CORP.

G

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT GAYNOR MONIQUE STEPHENSON, Appellant, v. LENDINGHOME FUNDING CORP., Appellee. No. 4D19-1589 [October 28, 2020] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barry Stone, Senior Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE16- 20523(11). Samuel D. Lopez of Samuel D. Lopez, P.A., Southwest Ranches, for appellant...

N.M., THE FATHER v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES

N

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT N.M., the Father, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, Appellee. No. 4D20-1477 [October 28, 2020] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Kathleen Kroll, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50-2019-DP-000366- XXXX-MB. Andrew A. Holness of the Law Offices of Andrew A...

ELISOL ST LOT v. STATE OF FLORIDA

E

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ELISOL ST. LOT, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D19-3022 [October 28, 2020] Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Charles A. Schwab, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502016CF002238A. Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Breanna Atwood, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for...

United States v. Denno

U

19-2999-cr United States v. Denno UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A...

United States v. Hunt

U

19-1754 United States v. Hunt UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A...

J.W. v. T.M. and C.M. (mem. dec.)

J

MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Oct 28 2020, 8:18 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals estoppel, or the law of the case. and Tax Court ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES Justin R...

Recent Posts

Recent Comments